|
It seems a bit unfair to me that a small mistake (probably a typo) causes you to have the complete problem graded as wrong So... Why not grade as in the AI class? I mean taking into account all the parts of the problem (all check boxes and stuff) . Because you know, to be wrong in some problem is not only lack of knowledge or confusion, typos also exist. |
Grading as in AI class
Search the forums
Markdown Basics
- *italic* or _italic_
- **bold** or __bold__
- link:[text](http://url.com/ "Title")
- image?
- numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
- to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
- basic HTML tags are also supported
Tags:
Asked: 01 Mar '12, 02:19
Seen: 138 times
Last updated: 01 Mar '12, 02:43
I support this! Had a typo in 1.1, and still don't undestand why the second value in 1.3 was graded as incorrect, while it was the same as in prof. Thrun video answer. And this stripped me of 50%, where something about the 40% of which are truly mine!