Build a robot is the buzzword... and wil get you a job!

ok, this is not a question, but this article just popped up in my twitter feed, and I think many of you will find it very interesting:

Looking to Build a Robot? Hiring Demand for Robotics Skills Grows 44 Percent

asked 27 Feb '12, 10:22

Anna-Chiara%20Bellini's gravatar image

Anna-Chiara ...
5.2k103175
accept rate: 12%

Sounds good. Let's hope it's not just jobs to replace humans, but rather using the skills to be better at something that's hard for people.

(27 Feb '12, 10:38) Ann Witbrock-1 Ann%20Witbrock-1's gravatar image
2

well of course we want jobs to replace humans. humans are expensive and should be spending their time doing things that robots can't do yet

(27 Feb '12, 10:57) qntmfred qntmfred's gravatar image

Yep, I thought that's what Bertrand was going on about...

http://www.zpub.com/notes/idle.html

(09 Mar '12, 09:24) Michael F Michael%20F's gravatar image

4 Answers:

There was once the job title "calculator". Instead of a new computer, you would purchase new logarithm tables (if you were lucky enough to live post Napier).

Perhaps one day machines will do all the jobs people don't like to do, and in the process, raise everyone's standard of living. Less work for humans should translate into more free time for people to pursue their interests (such as these classes!).

link

answered 27 Feb '12, 11:43

Rafael%20Espericueta's gravatar image

Rafael Esper...
12.8k66128192

edited 27 Feb '12, 11:44

1

Less work for humans should translate into more free time for people to pursue their interests...

Isn't that a bit too optimistic? I have no numbers to back up this claim, but I'm pretty sure that the introduction of industrial robots in the last 30 or so years has never led to a reduction of working hours anywhere.

Only in a very far future with a greatly revolutionized concept of covering one's living expenses would it be imaginable that a whole society can lean back and let robots do the work. That's a bit like Star Trek, which would be great of course. ;-)

(09 Mar '12, 08:05) Emil Emil's gravatar image
3

We work a lot less now than our ancestors did 200 years ago. The 40 hour working week would have been considered unrealistic not too long ago - automation has played a major role in enabling that today.

(09 Mar '12, 09:49) James Holyhead James%20Holyhead's gravatar image

Ann: It's a pretty fuzzy line though. Nearly all machines do things that once upon a time required people to be employed.

In a free economy there is no way to stop companies from finding cheaper and more efficient ways of doing things. Some of those things result in the short term loss of jobs, but some of them also result in expanding businesses which employ even more people in other ways. It's sometimes hard to predict which technological advances will have a net benefit to society.

link

answered 27 Feb '12, 10:49

Pax's gravatar image

Pax
1.0k21220

Nowadays it is relatively simple to build your own robot. Here is our (me and my friends did it) solution based on Kinect camera, Intel ATOM CPU, RC battery, PWM regulators for motors, Arduino (controling motors - PWM) and HengLong tank chasis. We also build SDK platform in .NET for an easy programming... At video is just very simple program module, which heads robots to the direction in which are obstacles in the longest distance (using depth data from Kinect) - nothing hard, just for ilustrate how it works. Currently we are improving a robot and putting another sensors on it. And in a few weeks I would like to start programming much sophisticated software based on this course... If you dont spend your money for own robot, just download Microsoft Robotic studio and configure and build there your own virtual robot...

link

answered 29 Feb '12, 17:20

Satiriasis's gravatar image

Satiriasis
312

I have some nice arduino compatible pic32 boards with a 128k flash and 16k sram. I am not sure if I would be able to pull off particle filters with only 16k sram. I also have asus eeepc with an messed up track pad and key board. I am thinking the eeepc and for positioning using a scanning line laser and a web cam to do 3d triangulation. Probably use the eepc for the webcam and number crunching, and use a pic32 or atemga8 for motor control and general io.

link

answered 09 Mar '12, 04:56

Tim%20McDonald's gravatar image

Tim McDonald
21526

I think this is the next revolution for low-cost robotics:
http://www.raspberrypi.org/

That, and the next generation of Kinect which is small enough to go in a laptop or tablet.

(09 Mar '12, 10:05) Pax Pax's gravatar image

I have been thinking I might be able pull off particle filters using the pic32. I don't to keep 1000 plus particles in memory I should be able to use a smaller number of particles and just do more sampling. I won't be able to use the web cam though I need a less processor and memory intensive sensor like sonar or an ir range finder. Fortunately those are both relatively cheap.

(09 Mar '12, 15:45) Tim McDonald Tim%20McDonald's gravatar image
Your answer
Question text:

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "Title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "Title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Tags:

×5,186
×80
×19
×18

Asked: 27 Feb '12, 10:22

Seen: 756 times

Last updated: 09 Mar '12, 15:45